AN EXAMINATION OF THE CAUSES OF JURISTIC DIFFERENCES IN INTERPRETATION IN ISLAMIC LAW

You have 10 free previews remaining
Previews reset on: Oct 31, 2025
Preview attempts remaining: 10 10 remaining

📄 Project Abstract

Differing is inevitable among people, because of individual natural differences regarding thinking, understanding, power of assimilation, intellect, etc. Thus, differences and contradictions are a natural outcome. Incidentally people have grossly misconceived differences of opinion among the jurists either due to their ignorance or lack of understanding of the nature of texts of the Qur'an and the Sunnah, and where the text is silent.Modern advocacy for adherence to hadith that has emerged in recent time, has painted a sordid picture of the classical jurists, depicting their works as mere academic exercise. This notion needs to be corrected. Otherwise, the Shari'ah will, in turn, not be suitable and applicable to new situations for which there is no decisive ruling in both the Holy Qur'an and the Sunnah.The aim is to show that the nature of the Qur'anic provisions makes the phenomenon of Ikhatilaaf (difference of opinion) among the jurists inevitable, that the nature of the provisions ...

🔍 Key Research Areas Covered
  • ✅ Literature Review & Theoretical Framework
  • ✅ Research Methodology & Data Collection
  • ✅ Data Analysis & Statistical Methods
  • ✅ Findings & Results Discussion
  • ✅ Recommendations & Conclusions
  • ✅ References & Bibliography
📚 Complete Project Structure
Chapter 1: Introduction & Background
  • Problem Statement & Objectives
Chapter 2: Literature Review
  • Theoretical Framework & Related Studies
Chapter 3: Research Methodology
  • Data Collection & Analysis Methods
Chapter 4: Data Analysis & Results
  • Findings & Statistical Analysis
Chapter 5: Discussion & Conclusion
  • Recommendations & Future Research
Appendices: Supporting Documents
  • Questionnaires, Data, References
⭐ Why Choose This Islamic Law Project Topics Project?
🎯 Well-Researched

Thoroughly researched with current and relevant sources

📊 Complete Data

Includes statistical analysis and detailed findings

✍️ Original Content

100% original research with proper citations

📝 Properly Formatted

APA/MLA formatting with table of contents

🎓 Supervisor Approved

Meets university standards and requirements

⚡ Instant Download

Immediate access after purchase

💬 What Students Say

"This project provided excellent guidance for my Islamic Law Project Topics research. The methodology was clear and the data analysis helped me understand the proper approach."

— Final Year Student, Law project topics
Full Citation:

Waheed Rafiu ADEROHUNMU. (). AN EXAMINATION OF THE CAUSES OF JURISTIC DIFFERENCES IN INTERPRETATION IN ISLAMIC LAW. African and General Studies, 40, 14858.

Citation Formats:
APA
Waheed Rafiu ADEROHUNMU. (). AN EXAMINATION OF THE CAUSES OF JURISTIC DIFFERENCES IN INTERPRETATION IN ISLAMIC LAW. African and General Studies, 40, 14858.
MLA
Waheed Rafiu ADEROHUNMU. "AN EXAMINATION OF THE CAUSES OF JURISTIC DIFFERENCES IN INTERPRETATION IN ISLAMIC LAW." African and General Studies, vol. 40, , pp. 14858.
Chicago
Waheed Rafiu ADEROHUNMU. "AN EXAMINATION OF THE CAUSES OF JURISTIC DIFFERENCES IN INTERPRETATION IN ISLAMIC LAW." African and General Studies 40 (): 14858.
Full Citation:

Waheed Rafiu ADEROHUNMU. (). AN EXAMINATION OF THE CAUSES OF JURISTIC DIFFERENCES IN INTERPRETATION IN ISLAMIC LAW. African and General Studies, 40, 14858.

Citation Formats:
APA
Waheed Rafiu ADEROHUNMU. (). AN EXAMINATION OF THE CAUSES OF JURISTIC DIFFERENCES IN INTERPRETATION IN ISLAMIC LAW. African and General Studies, 40, 14858.
MLA
Waheed Rafiu ADEROHUNMU. "AN EXAMINATION OF THE CAUSES OF JURISTIC DIFFERENCES IN INTERPRETATION IN ISLAMIC LAW." African and General Studies, vol. 40, , pp. 14858.
Chicago
Waheed Rafiu ADEROHUNMU. "AN EXAMINATION OF THE CAUSES OF JURISTIC DIFFERENCES IN INTERPRETATION IN ISLAMIC LAW." African and General Studies 40 (): 14858.
Need Help?